Sí a la Vida, No
al ALCA
On October 31, 2002 thousands
of people from across the Americas converged in Quito, Ecuador. They were not
there to celebrate the Dia de Musica Criolla, rather the men and women, young
people and elderly, and campesinos representing each country in Latin America,
joined in the common goal of demonstrating their opinion to oppose the Free
Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). Delegates from the 34 countries of the Western
Hemisphere, excluding Cuba) gathered in Quito to secretly negotiate the free
trade agreement, which is modeled on NAFTA and an expansion of the plan to increase
privatization and deregulation.
U.S. Trade Representative
Robert Zoellick described the U.S. interest in Latin America through CAFTA and
the FTAA as part of a bigger picture, “to advance U.S. objectives for
the multilateral negotiations currently underway in the World Trade Organization”
(8/22/02 letter to Congress). “We have no way to live, and the FTAA will
only make it worse. When we complain, the U.S. government calls us terrorists.
We are not threatening anything, but we are hungry and tired and things have
to change,” said Leonidas Iza, the President of the CONAIE (the Ecuadorian
indigenous federation).
The blatant U.S. imperialism
exercised in the FTAA not only will affect the people in Latin America by creating
colonies out of their countries, vulnerable to exploitation by the United States
and corporate interests. Many North Americans also are concerned about the impending
disaster if the FTAA is approved, which the U.S. hopes to achieve by January
2005.
Modeled after the World
Trade Organization's General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), the FTAA
will include commitments to "liberalize" trade in services such as
education, health care, environmental services (which can include access to
water!), energy, and postal services. Examples: Privatization of public schools
and prisons, like in the U.S. which would open the door to greater corporate
control, corruption and the cutting of critical corners (such as medical care
for inmates or upkeep of safe school facilities) to increase profits; and Privatization
of postal services by transferring U.S. Postal Service functions to a few delivery
companies like FedEx, which could then send postal rates through the roof.
Also, The FTAA provides
a potential "back door" for the Multilateral Agreement on Investment
(MAI) through the negotiations on investments and liberalization of the financial
services sector. Modeled on NAFTA's Chapter 11, the USTR says that FTAA will
include "investor-to-state" suits. These allow corporations to sue
governments in secret "corporate courts" for any act that may indirectly
affect their profits, such as the enforcement of public health laws. In other
words, the FTAA would provide a hemispheric "regulatory takings" clause
that explicitly values corporate profits over human costs and environmental
degradation.